southsamurai
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
If that’s the case, gotta work in a well rounded workout diet. At 10 (or did I misread?), he’s not going to pack on a ton of muscle, but he won’t put any on without the diet being balanced for the amount of work he’s putting in, even at kiddie karate level of output. If the classes are more serious, the workout they give will be too.
If you can’t get advice from a nutritionist, just up the protein a little at a time until he either starts gaining lean weight, or it becomes evident that his body just isn’t ready to gain that kind of mass yet.
Just track what he’s getting, and bump it up as needed, with the goal being (and this is general purpose, without knowing the kid or any medical history, so definitely triple check) in the 35 to 40 grams per day range. That’s just a tiny bit above the typically recommend levels for his age, but should be enough to notice change in a week or two.
You could likely go as high as 50 grams a day, though for sure talk to the doctor again before staying at that range. The increased protein intake shifts how a kid’s body handles calorie management, and I’m simply not up to date on the whole subject. Only reason I have recent enough info to merit commenting is having taught some kids in that age range some martial arts over the last couple of years.
Again, you gotta take internet advice with a grain of salt. No matter how well intended, no matter how well informed, we just don’t have the full medical breakdown, or any direct interaction with the lad to be certain of much of what we can say.
Only other thing I’d throw in is the general advice to not push beyond his appetite often. Sometimes, it’s necessary, but when it’s frequent, kids tend to adapt too well, and get focused on the wrong aspect. That can lead to over eating regularly. When they keep pushing past satiety, they can lose sensitivity to satiety to some degree or another. I tend to err on the side of offering things more often rather than increasing amounts per sitting.
Honestly, an athletic kid, you just make sure their protein intake keeps up with their activity and don’t worry much about weight until and unless the doctor says it’s a problem.
Your post and comments are kinda confusing in that regard, but it seems like the doctor isn’t worried about it, everything relevant has been checked and that this is a more general concern from your side. If that’s not the case, you could consult with a nutritionist and see what kind of dietary changes might better support the kid’s activity levels.
But, usually, it’s only weight loss that’s going to be a problem as long as growth is still ongoing
I did this to my kid once, only with a ball of yarn scraps.
My kid just grabs it, starts meowing, and bats it around the room.
And, no, my kid isn’t actually a cat. My kid is just a weird human lol.
This wasn’t even a toddler. The kid was 13.
And that’s pretty awesome :) keeping a sense of joy and imagination like that is cool
Pretty far in the past now, the kid has gotten a lot more resistant to fear over the years.
But, back when they were about 7, ghosts were the big fear at night.
Solution: ghost incense. One of those things I pulled out of my ass in the moment that worked like magic.
The kid didn’t want to go to bed. Was asked why. The answer was that they didn’t want ghosts to come get them.
In a rare flash of genius, I said “Well, I can fix that. Ghosts can’t go anywhere when you burn a stick of a special incense. I keep a box of it around for emergencies.”
We lit some nice smelling stuff, and said the magic words, and that was that.
Now, the next day, we had a nice conversation about how ghosts aren’t real, and even if they were, they’re ghosts, they can’t hurt anything. The kid asked if we could burn the “ghost sticks” anyway, just in case we were wrong lol. So it became the bedtime thing. When the kid would get tired, they’d show up with a stick of incense and ask me to light it.
By the end of that summer, the kid had said they weren’t scared of ghosts any more, but can we use the incense anyway, it smells nice.
Sometimes, trying to convince someone that their fear isn’t based in reality is not only impossible, but counterproductive. For a kid, it’s all about helping them manage the fear, give them control of it.
Ignoring the mountain of evidence that you can find with a quick search that corporal punishment in general, and “spanking” in specific doesn’t work in the way people think/want it to, there’s a giant flaw in logic here.
If a stranger does a thing to your kid, and you would want them arrested, why would you do the same thing?
Seriously. That’s the glaring flaw in the arguments. If I discipline your kid with a single swat to the rear, I have committed a crime. One which most parents would not only insist come with legal consequences, but a significant amount would feel totally justified in using force to protect their child ( and they’d be right in that use of force, imo).
But then you want to do the exact same thing or worse and don’t expect it to affect the child at least as severely as the trauma from battery by strangers. If someone is going to argue that they need to hit their kid to maintain discipline, then claiming that it only works when a parent does it is just stupid.
Worse, claiming that the affects of the trauma of an assault is magically not going to happen because it’s a parent is outright insane.
That’s why, even for the very limited benefits that can come from using spanking as a tool (that are achieved better by other methods) you end up with more drawbacks than it’s worth.
As I said to my parents and my family regarding my kid: if you attempt to use spanking or other violence to “discipline” or “teach” my kid, that means such methods are effective. If that’s the case, then me beating the fuck out of you and never letting you near my kid again is most definitely going to be effective in teaching you to never hit my fucking kid.
Why would it matter?
If the kids are young enough that they’re being dragged along, they aren’t going to care much. And it isn’t like life is perfect and you can always have someone else watch the little buggers. So, if the kids aren’t disruptive, and the parents are okay with the kids hearing the kind of talk you’d hear at an adult panel, that’s a valid choice. Nobody on “stage” needs to worry about censoring themselves. They can, but it isn’t mandatory.
If the kids want to go, nothing the panel is going to say will shock them. Any kid that’s a fan of a show like that is already past the point where a panel is going to say anything worse than that specific show.